Hours in spreadsheets
Someone on your team exports Search Console data, pastes it into a sheet and builds the monthly report. Every month, the same thing.
AI agents and SEO automation
I'm Pablo Caño, a technical SEO consultant. I build AI agents and automated workflows that handle the reports, alerts and checks eating your team's hours. I use them every week in my own work.
Prefer email? Write to me at consulta@pablocano.es
I work with the most advanced SEO and GEO tools on the market: Screaming Frog, Semrush, Ahrefs and Sistrix.
I also collaborate with agencies that bring in my technical judgment for their own clients.
Someone on your team exports Search Console data, pastes it into a sheet and builds the monthly report. Every month, the same thing.
Pages go live with an empty title, an inherited noindex or a broken link, because checking everything by hand isn't realistic.
A traffic drop or a page falling out of the index gets spotted weeks later, when it has already cost money.
Checks every new or edited page and alerts you in Slack or Teams if the title is missing, there's a noindex that shouldn't be there or the markup is broken.
Watches clicks and impressions on your key pages every day and flags anything out of the ordinary, before you notice it in sales.
Every week it combines Search Console and GA4, writes the summary and emails it. It remembers what was already recommended and checks whether it was done.
Analyses what Google returns for a search, pulls out the topics and questions the top results cover and prepares the brief for the writer.
Compares the HTML your site serves with what's there after JavaScript runs and flags templates where the title, copy or markup only exist afterwards.
Every week it compares your keywords with your competitors' through the Semrush or Ahrefs APIs and points out new opportunities.
Pablo knows technical SEO inside out and truly understands how AI is changing search.
You never have to explain the context twice. In this industry, that is worth a lot.
What can be automated, with which tools and where a person still makes the call.
Tasks that repeat and follow a clear rule can be automated: weekly Search Console reports, alerts when traffic drops or a page stops being indexed, title and metadata reviews at scale, keyword classification and checks after every deployment. Anything that involves a decision, such as what to publish or what to prioritise, still goes through a person, who also reviews what the workflow has prepared.
I use n8n for the workflows, the Search Console and GA4 APIs, Screaming Frog, Semrush and language models such as Claude through their APIs. If your team already uses other tools, such as Make, Slack, Google Sheets or Airtable, I work with those rather than adding another one. That way reports and alerts arrive where people already work every day.
It depends on the project, and you get the price in writing with a fixed scope within 48 hours of a 30-minute call. I don't publish rates because every website and every situation is different: reviewing six templates doesn't cost the same as reviewing sixty, and one market doesn't cost the same as five. It also matters whether you have developers available to implement the changes. A generic range wouldn't help you decide. What's in that quote is what I invoice.
Use the form or email me. I reply within 1-2 working days.
We look at the site together and at what's worrying you. If I'm not the right person, I'll say so there and then.
With a fixed scope and the price in writing. If it doesn't suit you, there's no commitment.
Send me the task that eats most of your team's hours and the tools you use. If it looks like a fit, I'll suggest a 30-minute call.