Review slows everything down
Every copy change goes through regulatory or medical-legal review. An SEO plan that doesn't allow for that just gathers dust.
Life sciences SEO
I'm Pablo Caño, an independent technical SEO and GEO consultant. I help life sciences companies get found on Google and cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews when someone asks about their field.
Prefer to go straight to it? Email me at consulta@pablocano.es
I work with the most advanced SEO and GEO tools on the market: Screaming Frog, Semrush, Ahrefs and Sistrix.
I also collaborate with agencies that bring in my technical judgment for their own clients.
Every copy change goes through regulatory or medical-legal review. An SEO plan that doesn't allow for that just gathers dust.
Scientific PDFs, datasheets and whitepapers take the traffic without the people who land on them ever seeing a form or a product page.
These are "Your Money or Your Life" searches, where Google looks much harder at who wrote each page and what sources it relies on.
When someone asks ChatGPT for suppliers in your field, your competitors or a sector directory come up and your company doesn't.
I work with one of the leading eQMS vendors and with AI companies focused on life sciences, so I know the sector's vocabulary and how people search when they compare a QMS or an eQMS.
Crawling, indexing, architecture, multi-market setups and migrations, with particular care over which documents should be indexed and which shouldn't.
Which pages you need, with what intent and which keywords, in a format regulatory can approve without rewriting it from scratch.
Structured data, brand entity and pages that answer the questions quality, regulatory and R&D people ask, making it easier for AI engines to cite you.
Taking people who arrive through a PDF or a guide to a demo, a contact or a gated download.
Corporate and product websites for different audiences (healthcare professionals and the general public), with heavily reviewed content.
Companies that need to be found by investors, partners and talent as well as customers. They often have a lot of science behind them and very little published on their website.
Technical catalogues and product documentation in markets where regulatory requirements vary from one region to another.
Long B2B sales cycles. Buyers take their time comparing suppliers and increasingly use AI assistants to do it.
QMS or eQMS software companies and AI tool vendors selling to quality and regulatory teams. They compete with each other for the same keywords (QMS, eQMS, CAPA, change control) on Google and in AI assistants.
Search was our biggest pipeline source, and Pablo helped us build our presence from the ground up.
Thanks to his work, we navigated a constantly changing search landscape and positioned our brand. He turns all of that complexity into clear, practical actions.
What marketing teams at pharma, biotech, medtech and CRO companies usually ask.
SEO fits well when review is part of the plan from day one. Before anything is written we agree which pages are needed and with what intent. Changes are then grouped so regulatory can review them all in one go. Technical recommendations such as architecture, crawling or structured data rarely touch approved copy, so they move forward in parallel while content is in review.
It means Google asks that website for stronger evidence of experience and trustworthiness. YMYL ("Your Money or Your Life") is Google's term for searches that can affect someone's health or finances. In life sciences almost all content falls into this category. In practice each page needs a clear author and cited sources, a visible review date and an identifiable company behind it.
It depends on the document, but the usual approach is to keep an indexed HTML page that summarises it and leads to the form or demo. PDFs are often what brings the most traffic and what converts worst, because someone landing on one never sees a page of your website. Once that HTML page is in place, you decide case by case which PDFs Google should keep showing.
Nobody can guarantee it, because each engine decides what to cite. The odds improve when Google and AI engines understand who your company is and what it does, which comes down to structured data and a consistent brand across the site. Pages that answer your buyers' questions clearly, with data and sources, also make a difference. Appearing in the sector listings and comparisons that AI engines read helps too.
It depends on the project, and you get the price in writing with a fixed scope within 48 hours of a 30-minute call. I don't publish rates because every website and every situation is different: reviewing six templates doesn't cost the same as reviewing sixty, and one market doesn't cost the same as five. It also matters whether you have developers available to implement the changes. A generic range wouldn't help you decide. What's in that quote is what I invoice.
Use the form or email me. I reply within 1-2 working days.
We look at the site together and at what's worrying you. If I'm not the right person, I'll say so there and then.
With a fixed scope and the price in writing. If it doesn't suit you, there's no commitment.
Tell me which field you work in, what kind of website you have and what you'd like organic search to achieve. If it looks like a fit, I'll suggest a 30-minute call.